Started By
Message

re: Christine Michael - myth or mistake?

Posted on 6/21/09 at 11:15 pm to
Posted by TigerBait45
Moreauville, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2007
1725 posts
Posted on 6/21/09 at 11:15 pm to
I think it was probably about Trent Richardson more than Seastrunk.

They thought they had a legit shot with Richardson and they liked him more.
Posted by ColtsTigers
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2009
2248 posts
Posted on 6/21/09 at 11:16 pm to
They're retarded if it was about TR. I think it had much more to do with Lache than TR. The chances of getting TR to flip after the season weren't that good.
Posted by gismap
Member since Apr 2009
1841 posts
Posted on 6/22/09 at 12:38 am to
quote:

They thought they had a legit shot with Richardson and they liked him more.

+1 FACT
Posted by eelsuee
2B+!2B
Member since Oct 2004
4508 posts
Posted on 6/22/09 at 9:54 am to
quote:

I think it was probably about Trent Richardson more than Seastrunk.
I think it was more about Michael than either of those guys.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram