- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: strength of schedule complaints
Posted on 5/28/09 at 11:18 am to Tigershatebama
Posted on 5/28/09 at 11:18 am to Tigershatebama
The NCAA could fix this problem:
1. They could eliminate the Division 1-A (FBS)/Division 1-AA (FCS) matchups. Sure the 1-AA team wins occasionally, but typically it's a terrible game from the fans' perspectives.
2. They could move all teams who can't average 25,000 fans per home game down to D1-AA. Yes, I know this would eliminate the most of the MAC and WAC and more than likely all of the Sun Belt, and half of CUSA and Mountain West (then combine the remnants of the MAC and CUSA as well as the WAC and Mountain West into two conferences), but it would provide much better matchups on a weekly basis. The Verge Ausberrys of the world couldn't go out and schedule the Central Rhode Island State Polytechnic Institutes for that 12th game.
3. They could produce a eight-team playoff. Only the conference champions would be eligible for the playoffs (forcing the Independants like Notre Dame to join a conference). Scheduling cupcakes for automatic wins would not be necessary since all you have to do is win your conference.
Unfortunately, these things will never happen because NCAA football is no longer for the fans. It's now simply about the colleges and universities making money.
1. They could eliminate the Division 1-A (FBS)/Division 1-AA (FCS) matchups. Sure the 1-AA team wins occasionally, but typically it's a terrible game from the fans' perspectives.
2. They could move all teams who can't average 25,000 fans per home game down to D1-AA. Yes, I know this would eliminate the most of the MAC and WAC and more than likely all of the Sun Belt, and half of CUSA and Mountain West (then combine the remnants of the MAC and CUSA as well as the WAC and Mountain West into two conferences), but it would provide much better matchups on a weekly basis. The Verge Ausberrys of the world couldn't go out and schedule the Central Rhode Island State Polytechnic Institutes for that 12th game.
3. They could produce a eight-team playoff. Only the conference champions would be eligible for the playoffs (forcing the Independants like Notre Dame to join a conference). Scheduling cupcakes for automatic wins would not be necessary since all you have to do is win your conference.
Unfortunately, these things will never happen because NCAA football is no longer for the fans. It's now simply about the colleges and universities making money.
Posted on 5/29/09 at 2:59 am to Sir Yin Yang
quote:i've often wondered what would happen if div-1 was broken up into divisions a la english premier league. each division could contain, say, 30 teams. win your division, move up next season. end up last, move down next season. it would eliminate bad matchups. you would definitely lose regional rivalries or conferences but the season would be tons more interesting.
The NCAA could fix this problem:
1. They could eliminate the Division 1-A (FBS)/Division 1-AA (FCS) matchups.
2. They could move all teams who can't average 25,000 fans per home game down to D1-AA.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News