- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ESPN is funny
Posted on 5/5/09 at 3:52 pm to MSMHater
Posted on 5/5/09 at 3:52 pm to MSMHater
quote:Buckle up. You're about to get pwn3d.
Ok, I gotta call bullshite on that one. I've come to except ESPN's bias. They are a private company that can air whatever they want, but their darling teams are NOT decided on winning.
USC
Lakers
Celtics
Red Sox
Yankees
They have always been the favorite teams, and there have been a total of 4 titles from the darlings over the past 5+ years. The bias is based on potential viewers, not championship prowess.
1994. Who were the "darling" teams?
Bulls - defending champs.
Knicks - arguably best in the East.
Magic - best in the East.
The Celtics were waving bye-bye to the Boston Garden and they got hardly any games on tv that year because they sucked. ESPN didn't wipe their asses.
USC didn't become a darling until they won the 2003 Orange Bowl. The Sox/Yanks rivalry wasn't shoved down our throats until the Sox started contending for a title this decade.
ESPN covers winners, no matter who they are.
Posted on 5/5/09 at 3:58 pm to xiv
I'm unbiased, and it appeared to me that the Lakers lost the game for themselves as opposed to just straight getting beat. I would not be surprised to see the Lakers rattle off four wins in a row, but it'd be kind of cool to see Houston do the same to them, L.A. needs to be taken down a notch.
Posted on 5/5/09 at 4:10 pm to xiv
quote:
Buckle up. You're about to get pwn3d.
Ya'll are really setting the standards too low for pwnage.
quote:
1994. Who were the "darling" teams?
Bulls - defending champs.
Knicks - arguably best in the East.
Magic - best in the East.
Didn't watch the NBA back then, except when MJ was on. So I can't really speak on it.
quote:
USC didn't become a darling until they won the 2003 Orange Bowl.
I thought their BCS title was 2004 orange bowl. 2003 was rose bowl and mythical national title, right? I may be mixed up. Anyway, thats still only one title. Does that warrant them more airtime then the two teams with 2 titles?
quote:
The Sox/Yanks rivalry wasn't shoved down our throats until the Sox started contending for a title this decade.
I may consent on that, except that its so overkill I feel like I've been watching sox/yanks stories, games, pregame, postgame, warmups, and personal lives for my entire adult life. ESPN is king at taking a good story, then dissecting and repeating it in so many ways that eventually people resent seeing it on.
quote:
ESPN covers winners, no matter who they are.
Utah get much coverage? Stanley Cup winner? Who won MLS last year? Follow the money xiv. Its a little about winning, and a lot about funding.
Leaving this damn hospital. Catch up on the response later!
This post was edited on 5/5/09 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 5/5/09 at 4:12 pm to xiv
quote:
Magic - best in the East.
Not in 1994.
And ESPN loved the Spurs, right?
Posted on 5/5/09 at 4:42 pm to xiv
Exactly.
These insecure frickers need to get out from under mommy's apron and take a look at the real mother fricking world.
These insecure frickers need to get out from under mommy's apron and take a look at the real mother fricking world.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News