- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who has/had more potential: Clayton or Randle?
Posted on 4/4/09 at 7:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/4/09 at 7:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Both were really highly touted coming out of HS. I think MC has/had more potential to be a great "college" player b/c of his talents on both sides of the ball coming out of HS (It was pretty clear that he was going to be a beast on STs from the beginning). I think RR has more "Pro" potential b/c he has higher end speed IMO.
I think Clayton's greatest attribute was his signing to play at LSU in the first place. The class of Clayton, Hill, Spears, Addai, etc... is the class that put LSU back on the map as a national power.
I think Clayton's greatest attribute was his signing to play at LSU in the first place. The class of Clayton, Hill, Spears, Addai, etc... is the class that put LSU back on the map as a national power.
This post was edited on 4/4/09 at 7:16 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News