Started By
Message

re: Who has/had more potential: Clayton or Randle?

Posted on 4/4/09 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22517 posts
Posted on 4/4/09 at 7:10 pm to
Both were really highly touted coming out of HS. I think MC has/had more potential to be a great "college" player b/c of his talents on both sides of the ball coming out of HS (It was pretty clear that he was going to be a beast on STs from the beginning). I think RR has more "Pro" potential b/c he has higher end speed IMO.

I think Clayton's greatest attribute was his signing to play at LSU in the first place. The class of Clayton, Hill, Spears, Addai, etc... is the class that put LSU back on the map as a national power.
This post was edited on 4/4/09 at 7:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram