And yes, I know how many times I've posted here. I'm happy for you 10,000+ posters that you have an opportunity for another post . With your downvote, of course.

Question for ChatGPT: In cases filed since January 2025 against persons Donald Trump considers his personal "enemies", how many have resulted in a guilty verdict?

The available reporting does not identify any clear tally of successful guilty verdicts from prosecutions widely characterized as targeting Donald Trump’s “enemies” since January 2025—but what evidence does exist points to essentially none (or at most a single ambiguous case).

What the data shows
Multiple analyses and reporting describe numerous investigations, indictments, and legal actions, but emphasize that these cases have largely failed, been dismissed, or not produced charges at all. Courts have thrown out cases, subpoenas have been quashed, and some prosecutions collapsed due to lack of evidence or procedural issues. Even politically supportive reporting notes that many efforts to prosecute perceived opponents “resulted in no charges” or stalled.

Possible exception
One widely reported conviction is that of a Wisconsin judge (Hannah Dugan) for obstruction in an immigration-related case. However, whether this counts as targeting a personal “enemy” of Trump is debatable—it was framed as an immigration enforcement case rather than part of a defined “enemies list.”

Bottom line
Confirmed guilty verdicts tied clearly to prosecutions of Trump’s personal “enemies”: 0. If including borderline or disputed cases: possibly 1.

Key takeaway
Despite a large number of investigations and public threats (hundreds of targets have been identified), the campaign has produced little to no courtroom success, with far more dismissals and failed cases than convictions.