Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Hypocrisy! Democratic Institute Pushes Strict Voter ID Abroad While Dems Fight It In US

Posted on 3/23/26 at 3:27 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137619 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 3:27 pm
Hypocrisy, know thee no bounds?
The National Democratic Institute, headed by Benjamin Witts' (Lawfare) wife, and including Tom Daschle, Stacey Abrams, and Donna Brazile on its Board, receives $181M/yr in taxpayer funding to make recommendations on international election integrity amongst other things.

NDI officially regards voter ID as an obligate electoral safeguard. Its publication, "Building Confidence in the Voter Registration Process," states that only citizens should vote and that voter ID cards "introduce an additional safeguard into the system," describing photo identification and fingerprinting as "standard election infrastructure." The NDI praised voter ID requirements in countries like Morocco, where it called a switch to requiring photo ID (aka Jim Crow 2) at the polls "a positive development."
quote:

Taxpayer-Funded National Democratic Institute NDI Pushes Strict Voter ID Abroad While Party Fights It in America
by Lynn Matthews
6 hours ago


In a meticulously researched X thread posted March 22, 2026, independent researcher DataRepublican has exposed a stunning double standard at the heart of Democratic election policy.

The thread, which quickly went viral with more than 7.9 million views, pulls directly from the National Democratic Institute (NDI)’s own official publications, election observation reports, and training materials. DataRepublican — whose Substack (datarepublican) and public-record deep dives have earned praise from Elon Musk (“Worth following”) and Charlie Kirk (“You’re a must follow”) — has once again delivered analysis that is spot-on and fully verifiable. As she has done repeatedly, she obtains her information by combing through publicly available government-funded documents, PDFs, and mission reports that mainstream outlets rarely examine.

NDI: The Democrats’ $181 Million International Election Arm
The National Democratic Institute is a congressionally funded nonprofit that receives roughly $181 million per year in U.S. taxpayer dollars, primarily through the National Endowment for Democracy. Its board has long included top Democrats: Stacey Abrams (vice chair), Donna Brazile, Tom Daschle, and others. For 40 years, NDI has worked in more than 100 countries teaching and supervising election processes.

According to NDI’s own 2001 guide, Building Confidence in the Voter Registration Process, only citizens should vote — and voter ID cards “introduce an additional safeguard into the system.” The same document calls photo identification and fingerprinting “standard election infrastructure.”

What NDI Demands Abroad
The thread highlights multiple NDI reports that praise the very policies Democrats now call discriminatory in America:

• Morocco: NDI celebrated the switch to requiring just one photo ID at the polls, calling it “a positive development.”

• Bangladesh: NDI praised photo voter ID cards for giving “a sense of empowerment and belonging to the disadvantaged and marginalized people of the country, particularly women.”

• Nigeria (2023): Stacey Abrams herself co-led the NDI election observation mission. The official report stated that biometric voter ID was “the most important contribution to raising confidence in electoral integrity.”

The Domestic Contradiction
Yet here at home, the same party and many of the same people take the opposite stance. Democrats have labeled the SAVE Act (which simply requires proof of citizenship to register to vote) as “Jim Crow 2.0.” Stacey Abrams has repeatedly called Georgia’s voter ID law “Jim Crow in a suit.”

DataRepublican points out the ultimate irony: By NDI’s own published criteria, 14 U.S. states that require no voter ID at all would fail basic election integrity standards if observed by the institute.

LINK
If we only had a responsible press or competent GOP Senate leadership, the NDI recommendations would be noted in every speech, every interview, and every presser a GOP member participated in.
This post was edited on 3/23/26 at 3:48 pm
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13530 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 3:39 pm to
Wonder what our resident Board liberals will have to say about this??
Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
4733 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Wonder what our resident Board liberals will have to say about this??


Only one legal scholar who frequents this board is qualified to opine on foreign elections. Unfortunately, he’ll be here soon to explain why you are wrong. And if you are right, he’ll explain why it’s not a big deal.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137619 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Wonder what our resident Board liberals will have to say about this??
WTF is there to say?
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
4733 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 3:53 pm to
Amazing. The hypocricy is amazing
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram