Started By
Message

re: Trump Vows Day One Executive Order Targeting Offshore Wind

Posted on 5/15/24 at 8:13 am to
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21970 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 8:13 am to
quote:

That’s false for land turbines. They make plenty of money


Without subsidies?

Not that, if the OP is correct, that any president should be talking about banning something like wind turbines. Just pull the subsidies if it's an inefficient use of funds. Subsidize nuke plants if you really want to get rid of fossil fuels.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12677 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Without subsidies?

Yeah. The subsidy is just a tax credit per Wh generated. There are a few that probably got DOE loans or some placed grants, but that's incredibly rare. The vast majority just get the tax credit.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21970 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Yeah. The subsidy is just a tax credit per Wh generated.


Tax credits are subsidies.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12677 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Tax credits are subsidies.

Im aware. I didn’t say it wasn’t. Hut they still make money regardless of the PTC (which also covers more than just wind).
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12677 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Subsidize nuke plants if you really want to get rid of fossil fuels.
Missed this part. We already do. They get a PTC just like wind and geo.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21970 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Missed this part. We already do. They get a PTC just like wind and geo.


That doesn't surprise me but we're obviously not pushing them like we are wind turbines. The regulatory process alone can render new nuke plants unfeasible.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12677 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

That doesn't surprise me but we're obviously not pushing them like we are wind turbines. The regulatory process alone can render new nuke plants unfeasible.

Biggest issue isn't regulatory, that cost and schedule is quantifiable. The bigger issues is cost of capital, political volatility, and NIMBY lawsuits pre-construction.

Investors need to tie up a huge amount of money to get the project moving, it has an incredibly long ROI and if the political climate changes and they boot the PTC, they're fricked. And once you get past all that uncertainty and get a term sheet, the locals grab the pitchforks and lawyers and you get to pay ten million to fend off the lawsuits.

Luckily, the IRA expanded on the old PTC and thats giving the people who provide the project capital better confidence that it can get done. We'll see. I have seen an increase in project diligence requests for nuclear, so that's something.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 12:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram