- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Judge" sides with people that blocked interstate for 4 hrs?
Posted on 5/2/24 at 12:58 pm to MFn GIMP
Posted on 5/2/24 at 12:58 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Is she saying that the State didn't prove these defendants were the actual people who did it and that police were wrong to only use social media to identify them? If that is the reason she sided with the defense then I'm on the fence about it but since guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard I lean towards being ok with that..
This is why this country is not meant for everyone. Its meant for productive, moral people. Unproductive, unmoral people use our civil protections to persecute their neighbors and get away with it. Its a social contract...that is now being broken daily
Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:13 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
This is why this country is not meant for everyone. Its meant for productive, moral people. Unproductive, unmoral people use our civil protections to persecute their neighbors and get away with it. Its a social contract...that is now being broken daily
That's a different conversation and one I'm willing to have but that's not the system we currently operate under. I would say the fact that she only dismissed charges against "half" of them is because the State didn't do their part in proving they were there. I may be wrong and if I am then I retract what I said and will agree she is an activist judge doing progressive things.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News