- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would the 1998 Pacers rank if they beat the Bulls and Jazz?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:09 am to Madking
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:09 am to Madking
quote:
I guess it depends on what you’d call a Superstar. Definitely an All-Star caliber player but IMO not a superstar at that stage of his career. Clutch as the come for sure but not what he was in the early 90s. That team’s strength was a ton of quality depth.
I think the issue is Jordan made great players seem only good in the 90s ha. He just had a way of psychologically beating his opponent.
1
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:18 am to Honest Tune
Look I’m not going to pushback much on Reggie being considered a Superstar. I think he was as dangerous as anyone and the most clutch shooter by far. I’m just saying at that point he was under 20ppg, under 2rpg and 2apg. Early 90s he was around 22-25ppg, 4rebs and 4assist. Maybe it was a product of them having someone like Jalen Rose off the bench to give him longer breaks but his numbers continued ti decline starting in 98. When I say superstar I think MJ, Shaq, Lebron, Curry, Duncan etc.. I just don’t think Reggie is on par with those guys.
This post was edited on 4/30/24 at 11:19 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News