- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 7:07 am to davyjones
Posted on 4/30/24 at 7:07 am to davyjones
quote:
But while I’ve got you on the “severity of the crime” aspect - the very fine art of application of discretion within the bounds of criminal investigation and prosecution is perhaps the most paramount aspect of the entire process. That’s literally where it all begins. The decision to “wield” that great authority and to implement the heavy force and authority that goes along with it. Not to mention the whole process ain’t exactly free or cheap.
That's exactly why the hypotheticals start with a potential state charge for murder. It really tightens the gap on the discretion angle, due to the severity of the crime.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News