Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:18 am to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26771 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:18 am to
quote:

The concept that an opposition DOJ should be free to malignantly go after an ex-POTUS for acts taken during the Presidency, despite legislative branch failure to remove under Article II of the Constitution for the same, is anathema to the Founders' intent and to our democracy.

You are correct. They are not “free” to charge or convict him for crimes committed as part of his official duties. He is immune from that after leaving office.

But under no circumstance does any impeachment proceeding impact that situation.

The Founders and Constitution separated impeachment and criminal prosecution. They are not related proceedings, even if they derive from the same act.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 10:19 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram