- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FTC just announces facially unconstitutional action
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:35 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:35 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
The state I live in (Washington) made non-compete clauses illegal in 2023 if the compensation of the individual involved is less than $100,000/year.
I have no problem with that. At all. The issue is the over reach of a federal agency. They don’t have that power.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 3:52 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I have no problem with that. At all. The issue is the over reach of a federal agency. They don’t have that power.
This is literally nothing more than an election year campaign ploy. The FTC knows they don't have this power and it will be struck down by the courts. They don't care. They just want to create the optic of the "bad red states", who will challenge the "law" as anti-employee and pro corporation.
I guess the good news is the USSC can use this to further erode the "lawmaking" ability of these government bureaucracies. The executive branch got a taste during 2020-2021 of what could be when allowed to make "laws" without actually going to the legislative process, which is the foundation of our system of government, and they want to keep testing the boundaries to see how much power they can actually get away with.
And I say this as someone who believes anti-compete clauses should be significantly restricted.
This post was edited on 4/23/24 at 3:53 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News