Who is more important:

Randle because we will need a solid receiver because LaFell is probably as good as gone

I hate to even answer this question because I think we need both of these guys, but if pressed I think you have to go with Randle. He is elite. He is as good as Julio Jones, and look what a difference maker he was this year.

Exactly. But look at the other recievers we will have coming in next year (maybe debose, k bell, and benton) not to mention tolliver and the mitchells.

I do see where you are coming from though. I just think its easier to find a great reciever than it is to find a great cornerback.

From an outside opinion, I would say it's probably a push. If y'all are not to get Randle, you probably still end up with Benton, Bell, Debose, and Kelly to go along with the two Tollivers and maybe Lafell. Pretty good group right there.

quote:

---

He is elite. He is as good as Julio Jones

---

Randle is good, but this is false.

Yeah I agree that is false because he is better than Julio.

Julio is the most impressive freshmen receiver I can remember. I hope that Randle can approach his impact. It won't be easy.

quote:

---

Maybe I shouldn't have said "he's as good as". Randle has to prove that himself, but he has every bit as much potential. There is no doubt about that.

---

I agree with that.

Jackson.

Lockdown corner you don't find everyday.

Randle is a great talent, but we have great talent at the WR spot. Benton is every bit as good as Randle, and Debose will be a great slot guy. Add in 2 Toliver/Tollivers, and everyone is forgetting about Peterson. And of course don't forget Bell.

The same can't be said at CB. We have Peterson and that's the only lockdown corner we have. We get 2 and then we can send the house every damn time.

Lastly, from all indications if we lose Randle to Bama, we pick up Kelley, who is 6'4" (maybe 6'5" by the time he plays) and is a beast in his own right.

I hope this makes sense to everybody.