- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USAF plans to retire more A-10 Warthogs; “crippling” close air support capabilities
Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:44 am to HenryParsons
Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:44 am to HenryParsons
Let's be honest. USAF has wanted to shitcan these for a long, long time. Too cheap and effective and PAID FOR. No Generals getting Board positions and kickbacks for these. Need mo $100 million fighters!!!
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:06 am to jbgleason
quote:
Too cheap and effective
The National Defense Strategy tells us our pacing threat is China. The services are supposed to request funds that build a force to execute said strategy. With that in mind, you figure out where you think A-10s would be based for a fight against China, then overlay where you think the tankers needed to get them into the fight will come from, then look at how you think the A-10 would survive the Chinese Integrated Air Defense System (IADS). After you understand all of that, you too would know why we should have already divested the entire A-10 fleet.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News