Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS: Public officials can be held liable for blocking critics on social media

Posted on 3/15/24 at 7:41 pm to
Posted by DByrd2
Fredericksburg, VA
Member since Jun 2008
9091 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 7:41 pm to
For someone who harps on using precedents for his arguments, you sure don’t have a lot of regard for the precedents your arguments would set…
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432365 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

you sure don’t have a lot of regard for the precedents your arguments would set…

The court is the one who likes the foresight and they made a terrible decision years ago with Trump and now they're doubling down. They're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole and it doesn't make sense and is going to create a gordian knot and lots of unintended consequences. They are forcing private companies into the regulatory space of public rights, but will pick and choose randomly in the future what this applies to, which indicates they don't really have a strong basis (possibly belief) in the ruling. It's a results-oriented decision. Courts are not good at grappling with technology and our Constitution.n
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram