Started By
Message

re: Something big on Friday 3/15

Posted on 3/15/24 at 3:14 pm to
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
61866 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

where millions of people were dying



People were dying, yes. Spoiler Alert: People were dying before, at precisely the same rates as the years before and after.

quote:



TOTAL U.S. DEATHS [ALL CAUSES]:
2017 Total Deaths US: 2,813,503 (234,000/month)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db328.htm
2018 Total Deaths US: 2,839,205 (237,000/month)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db355.htm
2019 Total Deaths US: 2,855,000 (238,000/month)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
2020 Total Deaths US (jan - week 9/26): 2,130,000 (236,000/month)
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Weekly-Counts-of-Deaths-by-State-and-Select-Causes/muzy-jte6
2,130,000 + (236,000/month x 3) [Oct, Nov, Dec] = 2,838,000 [assumption based on monthly avg]
2020: 2,838,000 [3-month assumption insert]
2019: 2,855,000
2018: 2,839,000
2017: 2,814,000
Why did select [D] govs push C19 infected patients into nursing homes?
% of total C19 deaths attributed to nursing home(s)?
Who is most susceptible?
Same [D] govs who pushed C19 infected patients into nursing homes attempting to keep State(s) closed?
Why?


quote:

due to a respiratory virus


That's precisely what your television told you.



quote:

this vaccine was the only treatment.

The "vaccine" that's not an attenuated virus?
quote:

this vaccine was the only treatment.

The "vaccine" that didn't prevent you from getting the virus, and the CDC and other global health "experts" perpetually rolled back claims of efficacy to the point of letting go of the rope for what benefits it actually provided, if any?
quote:

this vaccine was the only treatment.

The "vaccine" that was in reality an experimental gene therapy?
quote:

this vaccine was the only treatment.

This is factually incorrect in every possible way. Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were proven to be mightily effective in ending infection. Even Anthony Fauci's NIH published a paper in 2005 saying that they were beneficial in treating SARS-coronavirus strains.

Instead, the MSM and your favorite political ruling class demonized inexpensive, established medicines 24/7, mischaracterizing their usage as being the likely cause of "vaccine"-induced myocarditis.

Remember, use of Ivermectin was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 for treatment of parasites.

Hydroxychloroquine has been in regular use since the 1950s, with some patients taking it DAILY FOR DECADES. Wouldn't we see the cardiac issues in those people, if "abuse" of it were going to happen, irrespective of the application?
This post was edited on 3/15/24 at 3:22 pm
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
2561 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 3:18 pm to
Careful Vox, that may be to many facts in one post for it to comprehend. Imagine still thinking that the "Vax" was a good thing
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22072 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

People were dying, yes. Spoiler Alert: People were dying before, at precisely the same rates as the years before and after.


That is incorrect.

quote:

due to a respiratory virus
That's precisely what your television told you.



I didn't need a television, only my eyes.

quote:

The vaccine that's not an attenuated virus?


Welcome to technology.

quote:

Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine


Were and are scams, and only gullible fools believe they provide a benefit against Covid-19.

quote:

Remember, use of Ivermectin was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 for treatment of parasites.


I know this is hard for you, but parasites are not viruses.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram