Started By
Message

re: Wicked

Posted on 2/13/24 at 7:42 am to
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 2/13/24 at 7:42 am to
quote:

It's honestly shocking that people are taking issue with this statement.


Nah....it's 2024 and this is a message board.

Some are honestly taking issue and some are sht-posting.

As for me, I spit on "Wicked" and everything about it, mainly because I have such admiration for unique, creative minds.

Baum/Tolkien etc. created such incredible, unique, vast worlds and I'm not a fan of people taking those ideas, perverting them, adding a few rhinestones and crowing about THEIR "original" works, especially when it is so blatantly disrespectful and offensive towards the original.

I'm a creator and I understand who hard it is to do anything even remotely approaching original and I know Baum would be repulsed at what many have done to his works.

To each his/her own.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
51064 posts
Posted on 2/13/24 at 7:47 am to
I think Wicked is pretty respectful of the source material. Sure, it changes the motivations and intentions of many characters, but it doesn't spit all over the original work.

There's a retelling of Beowulf out there put out by some feminist psycho that is absolutely egregious. This ain't that.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25999 posts
Posted on 2/13/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Baum/Tolkien etc. created such incredible, unique, vast worlds and I'm not a fan of people taking those ideas, perverting them, adding a few rhinestones and crowing about THEIR "original" works, especially when it is so blatantly disrespectful and offensive towards the original.


The ruby red slippers really pisses you off as it defeats the original metaphor... I'm sure.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram