Started By
Message

re: Straw Poll- Zions Future

Posted on 1/28/24 at 4:28 pm to
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
73878 posts
Posted on 1/28/24 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

His output is replaceable


But the idea would be to get more than his output.

quote:

You either get a good player in return (Mikal Bridges type) or a guy that you think can become an all star level player .



We already have that in Zion. So what's the point of moving him just to bring in a comparable talent?

The only way the FO moves him is if they can have him highlight a package that returns a top 10 level player. Or you do an AD type trade that gives you a bunch of picks to start over.
Posted by AboveTheRim
Member since Sep 2020
478 posts
Posted on 1/28/24 at 4:40 pm to
My point is if you can replace his output it doesn’t have to be a rebuild .

Pels have too many other players to be in total rebuild .

Teams get themselves in trouble by hoping their best players become stars and shuffling the deck around them only to find out that their other pieces aren’t the issue and the value on the big piece is bumpkis

So if you believe there is upside with your others, move the “big piece “ while maybe you can still get fair value and see if the group can be better than the sum of its parts or get an asset that you think has a higher ceiling than what Zion’s currently is .
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram