- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Do equity protections for non voting shares exist
Posted on 1/26/24 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 1/26/24 at 4:54 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 10:12 am
Posted on 1/27/24 at 10:25 am to lsuconnman
quote:Probably not. A controlling shareholder generally has a fiduciary duty to minority shareholders, and must take the company’s interest and the minority shareholder interests in account. If the controlling shareholder is on both sides of a transaction as you described, this might be a breach of the fiduciary duty of loyalty for self dealing. A lot of factors come in to play in the entire analysis. A caveat to this—if the minority shareholders also share in the benefit of the deal, then self dealing may not be found.
Can a PE firm just buy a majority of the voting shares in order to carve out the profitable portions of the business it wants to take private and sell to itself?
Popular
Back to top

1





