- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did the state Supreme Court hear the St George case today?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:09 am to NorthEnd
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:09 am to NorthEnd
I am blown away this whole thing is even a question.
How can one city tell people that are not even a part of said city that they can't form a city?
How can one city tell people that are not even a part of said city that they can't form a city?
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 10:13 am
1
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:17 am to SG_Geaux
Legally, BR can argue a “disparate impact” from St George incorporating, but one of the SC justices spelled it plain out as “You’re bringing in tax dollar from there but not providing any services.”
They have also argued at least one technical point that the petition was invalid due to the full plan of government not being on it, as opposed to having a URL to it.
The latter one is more splitting hairs and the law being behind the times than anything else.
They have also argued at least one technical point that the petition was invalid due to the full plan of government not being on it, as opposed to having a URL to it.
The latter one is more splitting hairs and the law being behind the times than anything else.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News