- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2024 Australian Open Thread.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:51 am to lsupride87
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:51 am to lsupride87
quote:
2024 Australian Open Thread. by lsupride87Yeh saying high school is too broad The top 10 in 14s could beat them The top 40 in 16s could beat them The top 100 in 18s could beat them
Gauff and Sabalanka are 12.90 plus UTR.
No 1 boy in USTA 14s is a 10.40. Most below him in boys 14 are below that UTR ranking. Can’t see them beating either.
Boys 16 USTA no 1 and Boys 18 No 1 are 12.18 and 12.10.
Boys 16 - theres a drop off after top 20 in UTR. These too 16s kids could certainly play with the female pros. Maybe get a few wins. But women would win more than not.
Boys 18 - they have lower UTRs than the top women. But I’m sure the top 40 guys can all play with the top women and can get wins. But I don’t think it’s a certainly the boys would win them all the time. (Against top 5 women).
This post was edited on 1/26/24 at 9:21 am
Posted on 1/26/24 at 12:30 pm to Roscoe
On Meds in gentleman's final at +260, bro
Posted on 1/26/24 at 1:45 pm to Roscoe
quote:
UTR
I’m not super familiar with how that works. Is it designed for that purpose (comparing levels of players who would generally never face each other)? Are there examples of women and men with a similar UTR playing “official” matches against each other?
This post was edited on 1/26/24 at 1:46 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News