- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is it Realistic that an NIL contract REQUIRE players to play in ALL games?
Posted on 12/31/23 at 10:42 am to AlextheBodacious
Posted on 12/31/23 at 10:42 am to AlextheBodacious
quote:
The only problem is people caring about bowls that don’t matter.
I hardly think enjoying watching a game is a problem. These games "matter" because we enjoy watching them. But that applies to ALL games. If there were no fans, these games really wouldn't matter much at all. Who wins or loses wouldn't matter. Who opts out wouldn't matter. Whom signs where wouldn't matter. And NIL would definitely not be a thing. This is all about entertainment so viewers matter. More viewers equals more money. As spectators, we enjoy watching these games...for now. They still matter to us. And frankly, I would like to continue watching them in the future. But something needs to change. These opt outs will certainly make them less and less interesting.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)