Started By
Message

re: Napoleon

Posted on 12/2/23 at 10:01 pm to
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8718 posts
Posted on 12/2/23 at 10:01 pm to
If you go in with low expectations and aren't looking for historical accuracy it's not bad.

They made him seem like an idiot and a cuck way too much, and more than that not terribly smart. In reality he was absolutely brilliant and that seemed to really get lost.

They spent a lot of time on the Josephine stuff which I get, it's Hollywood, it just screwed up the flow and since she died before Waterloo it really didn't work.

The battle scenes are great, did a good job of showing strategy and while somewhat graphic they weren't focused on just being gore either.

Mainly though they just didn't explain what was going on very well and tell the bigger picture. It was a like he just kind of showed up here or there randomly instead of really fleshing out the history and what was going on with France and the other powers. They flirted with it but it came out very jumbled and didn't really make sense.

Considering the crap that comes out of Hollywood today? It's pretty good. If you are looking for another Gladiator? Uh, no.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram