Started By
Message

re: New evidence - New Grand jury for criminal Alec Baldwin

Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:56 pm to
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
28460 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

What new evidence is needed? He shot and killed her, due to at least his negligence. But, since he can afford good attorneys and of his notoriety, he'll never be convicted, let alone spend 5 minutes in prison.


I cba to look up their laws on the subject, but I can tell you that in Louisiana, “negligent homicide” for example, requires criminal negligence, not simply negligence. So a gross deviation from the standard of care as opposed to simply a deviation. Wouldn’t surprise me if their statutes draw a similar distinction.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
14896 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:58 pm to
Guy thought it was a prop gun. I don't like him or his politics either, but I don't understand why prison is the right ending here. He had hired professionals to do their jobs with the props and it was his production, so obviously he's civilly liable big time, but he wasn't criminally negligent.

Or am I missing something?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram