Politico sums up the indictment

You thought POLITICO was "unbiased"?

You have reached the depths of clowndom.

What a stupid statement for someone who supposedly follows politics to make.

It is a report

The crux: Trump lied

Guess we need to start building jails specifically for politicians…..

Also this is lulzworthy

quote:

---

Many of the central details in the indictment tracked closely with the evidence amassed by the Jan. 6 select committee. But large swaths of the committee’s probe went unmentioned. Among them: The indictment makes no reference to the organization of Trump’s Jan. 6 rally or the financing that went into it. It omits evidence of Trump’s serious consideration of a plan to use federal or military power to seize voting machines from several states in which Trump disputed the outcome. It includes no allegations of any links between Trump and the extremist groups who attacked the Capitol or references to others featured by the Jan. 6 committee as key players, like Roger Stone, Steve Bannon and Alex Jones.

---

Weird these more grievous charges weren’t brought. Weird

The crux: Trump lied



If you think this is what this case is about I don’t know what to tell you.

quote:

---

If you think this is what this case is about I don’t know what to tell you

---

The case is a political take down attempt. The lying is the only thing they think they can get to stick.

That’s telling…

Simple. Donald J. Trump poses a threat to the Cabal. And what is the Cabal?

- Globalist - No Borders Crowd
- LGBT perverts and Groomers
- Climate Change Population Control Lunnies
- Deep Pocketed Democrat Donors with demands
- Military-Industrial Complex Warmongers
- ChiCom funded U.S. politicians
- Outright Satanist

Did I leave anybody out?

Donald Trump's "America First" initiative goes against everything these people are striving to shove down our throats.

I thought that was telling too. Looks like Smith has no evidence at all that Trump was involved in financing or organizing the rally.

The case is a political take down attempt. The lying is the only thing they think they can get to stick.

That’s telling…



So you haven’t read the indictment but just repeat things you hear on your chosen media. In the third paragraph, it says he has the right to say whatever he wants and even has the right to lie, which everyone knows he was.

This case is about him taking illegal “actions” to subvert the election results. Actions are not speech.

Correct. It has nothing to do with first amendment rights.

quote:

---

I thought

---

Stopped reading here. . .