Started By
Message

re: Is 0w20 really what is best for our vehicles?

Posted on 7/22/23 at 5:37 pm to
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49048 posts
Posted on 7/22/23 at 5:37 pm to
OK, the absolute only reason they are going with these light oils is for mileage, if they were better they would have been using them. Synthetic oils also have their drawbacks.

But the fact is the lighter oils ARE worse for wear.
This post was edited on 7/22/23 at 5:43 pm
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25882 posts
Posted on 7/22/23 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

But the fact is the lighter oils ARE worse for wear.


Blanket statements like this are rarely correct.

A lighter oil may or may not allow more wear in an engine. Even if a higher viscosity oil has a higher film strength the engine still has to be designed to use it. Thicker oils than recommended will run hotter and will not coat tight tolerance parts as well and will be slower, especially at colder temperatures at getting oil to all the internals on cold starts. Oil pumps designed for thinner oils can have issues keeping the volume high enough at the far ends of the oiling system.

There is zero doubt that in the search for CAFE benefits and HP numbers from manufacturers that don't care about CAFE for certain vehicles, we are seeing thinner oils. But jumping up several oil viscosities on an engine designed with lower viscosities in mind will likely increase wear vs decreasing wear.

There are reasons to go outside the manufacturers suggestions for oil but if thicker is better in a blanket way then why not run 90 weight gear oil in your crankcase?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram