Started By
Message

re: Let’s talk secondary

Posted on 7/18/23 at 10:52 am to
Posted by Brobocop
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2018
1955 posts
Posted on 7/18/23 at 10:52 am to
I think the 2022 secondary had more question marks than 2023, and they were more than serviceable!

With key transfer additions, I think we'll be above average.

I trust in Matt House.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
29557 posts
Posted on 7/18/23 at 11:11 am to
quote:

I think the 2022 secondary had more question marks than 2023, and they were more than serviceable!


Bernard-Converse was a veteran player who had performed well in the Big 12. Garner had SEC size and, if nothing else, had a lot of college experience. At safety Brooks and Foucher had a ton of SEC experience. Ultimately, the Safety position was ok and CB was better than expected. Particularly given both CBs were reliable for a team that didn't have a ton of depth.

Alexander has the size. But it is a big jump from SLU to LSU. Chestnut was solid at Syracuse, but isn't coming in with quite the bona-fides Bernard-Converse brought. One advantage the 2023 team may have is more depth with Welch and Harris. Both COULD be really good...we just don't know yet.

At Safety there is at least some continuity with Burns, Brooks, and Ryan returning. None of that group is in the Delpit, Adams, Matheiu etc category. But you hope their experience is enough to make them a solid unit.

The secondary is the biggest question mark on the team. It's unrealistic to expect them to be great. But they will have to be, at least, good enough. Otherwise, LSU may find themselves in more than a few shoot-outs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram