Started By
Message

re: Why don't suburbs like Central and Walker ban high density developments?

Posted on 3/5/23 at 8:40 pm to
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17774 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 8:40 pm to
Central at least has higher standards. No DSLD or Horton.

All of the crackhead are from Central Woods. It's been there for over 30 years.
This post was edited on 3/5/23 at 8:41 pm
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
49139 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 8:42 pm to
Central Woods was shady when I was in high school.
Posted by JAMAC2001
Member since Jan 2013
2768 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Central at least has higher standards. No DSLD or Horton.

All of the crackhead are from Central Woods. It's been there for over 30 years.


Very true. In general, single family homes are of high quality in Central.

However, that new apartment complex (The Reserve at Shoecreek) is filling fast with section 8 vouchers. Not even close to the type of residents and development it was proposed to be.

Hopefully with a new mayor and entirely new city council since the shoecreek debacle, we can prevent another mistake like this going forward.

Make no mistake though, Central has far better safeguards against shitty development than Livingston and Ascension. Question is how long will it remain that way.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram