- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why don't suburbs like Central and Walker ban high density developments?
Posted on 3/5/23 at 8:40 pm to BeepNode
Posted on 3/5/23 at 8:40 pm to BeepNode
Central at least has higher standards. No DSLD or Horton.
All of the crackhead are from Central Woods. It's been there for over 30 years.
All of the crackhead are from Central Woods. It's been there for over 30 years.
This post was edited on 3/5/23 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 3/5/23 at 8:42 pm to LSUSkip
Central Woods was shady when I was in high school.
Posted on 3/5/23 at 9:35 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
Central at least has higher standards. No DSLD or Horton.
All of the crackhead are from Central Woods. It's been there for over 30 years.
Very true. In general, single family homes are of high quality in Central.
However, that new apartment complex (The Reserve at Shoecreek) is filling fast with section 8 vouchers. Not even close to the type of residents and development it was proposed to be.
Hopefully with a new mayor and entirely new city council since the shoecreek debacle, we can prevent another mistake like this going forward.
Make no mistake though, Central has far better safeguards against shitty development than Livingston and Ascension. Question is how long will it remain that way.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)