- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIV Ratings
Posted on 2/28/23 at 3:47 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 2/28/23 at 3:47 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Lets discuss this. I remember when you and others said, the PGA should have “let them play a few LIV events, what’s the harm?”
You ignored the entirety of my post, except for this?
quote:
LIV requires 14 events.
Which 14 pga events would be compromised by this?
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 3:48 pm
2
Posted on 2/28/23 at 3:48 pm to BBONDS25
Because the rest of your post is nonsense. If LIV didn’t exist, I could watch DJ and Cam play against the other best in the world. But as of now I can’t. So I will continue to root for its quick implosion. Not because “I hate LIV”, because I love watching the best players all being together
Posted on 2/28/23 at 3:50 pm to BBONDS25
quote:If players are being required to play 14 LIV events, they aren’t going to play the pga tour. Giving up your players isn’t really a good business model
Which 14 pga events would be compromised by this?
The best are going to play roughly 20 ish events a year.
So jays choice was “let the players willing leave for LIV and implode the pga” or “ban them and make a few posters on tigerdroppings angry”
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 3:52 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News