re: Wade did something that is now legal thru NIL

quote:

---

It absolutely is semantics. At the root of Wade’s “issue” was the fact that players were getting paid

---

It’s not. It matters. Even professional leagues where owners have to pay players, teams get in trouble if they slip extra money under the table to avoid salary caps. It’s different if a player gets an endorsement.

Players have always gotten money, but it’s rarely ever if at all coming from the coach. Boosters do that shite

“It’s a semantic who pays it”

No it is not.

It’s semantics why they’re getting paid but it still has to be outside parties.