re: Pfizer immunity legal research project - on how to avoid

This is interesting. The PREP Act appears to have applied to Treatments. Are the "vaccines" considered "treatments"

Moreover, there are exceptions for fraud and development for ill purpose, which, BTW that Project Veritas video gives some pretty compelling evidence about . . . Pfzier doesn't need to be worried about cops, but may need to worry about some mass consumer class action.

Plus, the vaccine injury fund law doesn't define the word vaccine. The only definition I could find is in the freaking tax code: "Vaccine.--The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases."
26 U.S.C.A. § 4132 (West)

A vaccine, is a vaccine, if the Secretary of Health and Human Services says it is. There are no criteria either in the statute itself or in the Code of Federal Regulations that tell us how something qualifies for a vaccine.

Y'all some lawyer somewhere could have a field day with this. Wednesday, esq. does not have that kind of resources, but there is very shaky legal basis for this "immunity" that Pfizer thinks it has.

It only exists bc Pfizer as a practical matter controls the people that work for the Health and Human Services, and the Deep State actually runs the government.

I have to go to lie down bc 45 minutes of research has given me some vapors