Started By
Message

re: I just read Kevin Costner turned down the Andy role in Shawshank for Waterworld

Posted on 1/24/23 at 11:07 am to
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101931 posts
Posted on 1/24/23 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Didn’t Waterworld do much better at the box office than Shawshank?


Yeah, but at around 10x the production budget.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22920 posts
Posted on 1/24/23 at 11:18 am to
Costner directed and produced Waterworld and undertook one of the most difficult film shoots in modern cinematic history.

After his success with Dances With Wolves, Costner was obviously in the mood to be the great American film creator and he had all the leverage and power at the time to make that happen.

I still like Waterworld. I saw it in the theater and still watch it every time it's on.

Costner had full control in that picture and would not have had it on Shawshank. As alluded to in a post before, I don't think Costner regrets one thing about making Waterworld, much else in his career.

For the most part, once he was an established star, I think he made exactly what he wanted to.

Now... Connery turning down Gandalf... Now that's a regret... One to the tune of $400M and a decision that basically ended one of the great movie star careers of the last 60 yrs.
This post was edited on 1/24/23 at 11:20 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram