- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ok the targeting rule has to be reassessed
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:51 pm to Choupique19
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:51 pm to Choupique19
quote:
But if that isn’t targeting, almost nothing is
Forehead hit, not crown. Hard hit, but not targeting. I think they got that one right.
3
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:58 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Forehead hit, not crown. Hard hit, but not targeting. I think they got that one right.
They had the rule on the screen. Doesn't have to be crown of the helmet.
Has to be a hit to the head/neck area. It was a deliberate hit to the Tulane player's head.
Absolutely it was targeting.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:06 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Forehead hit, not crown. Hard hit, but not targeting. I think they got that one right.
This. The intent of the rule is to not hit with the crown of the helmet. Defender had his head up and hit with his forehead, top of the face mask. Hence, not targeting. Good no call IMO.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:09 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Forehead hit, not crown. Hard hit, but not targeting. I think they got that one right.
Crazy that people can make a judgement on a rule that they have never read.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News