- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brian Kelly and "analytics" on going for 2
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:32 pm to Indiana Tiger
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:32 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:
The decision Kelly made was we were not playing for a tie and overtime. You can agree or disagree with this decision, but once made, the analytics would tell you to go for two. The reason why is that you want to know were you stand (i.e. how many scores you need) asap as this effects how you play the rest of the game. Overall this increases your odds of winning somewhat.
This is the best explanation I've seen of it. The idea that it is all "analytics" is misguided in my mind.
I thought the decision and failure to convert psychologically killed our chances ultimately, though. My "gut" choice would have been to just keep rolling along as if it was a normal touchdown + XP at that juncture.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News