Started By
Message

re: Respect for Marriage Act passed by Senate. Goes to House for final vote.

Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:22 am to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:22 am to
quote:

§ 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof

(a) In General.—No person acting under color of State law may deny—

(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or

(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.
God forbid that we look at the actual language of the legislation, when arguing about what the legislation does.
Posted by MasterDigger
Member since Nov 2019
2172 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:39 am to
quote:

God forbid that we look at the actual language of the legislation, when arguing about what the legislation does.
No shite groomer... here is a section you seem to be avoiding:

quote:

SEC. 6. No impact on religious liberty and conscience.
quote:

(b) Goods or services.—Consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution, nonprofit religious organizations, including churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, nondenominational ministries, interdenominational and ecumenical organizations, mission organizations, faith-based social agencies, religious educational institutions, and nonprofit entities whose principal purpose is the study, practice, or advancement of religion, and any employee of such an organization, shall not be required to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage. Any refusal under this subsection to provide such services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges shall not create any civil claim or cause of action.


Notice it DOES NOT INCLUDE individual companies in the regular market place. Only government approved non-profits and their employees.

It WILL make you bake a cake with messaging which you disagree with.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8404/text
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

AggieHank86


quote:

"God forbid that we look at the actual language of the [LBGQ+ Polygamy+ / Bestial+ Marriage] legislation..."


Aaah, yes -- "looking at the language" AND "Legislation" -- two altogether different issues (as though any of us got a chance to look at this particular piece of LBGQ+ Guano.)

Other than citing "muh State" bullet points, *have* you actually "looked at the language *fine-print*??

Btw, it's NOT "God" who "forbids" the examination of "special" Acts like this garbage or 'The Patriot Act' for example; It's the Overlord subversives' any proposed Legislation that's been enacted in hours because *IF* read, examined and scrutinized without public debate or consent, said Guano would NOT not pass muster as heads rolled.

quote:

"God forbid that we look at the actual language....when arguing about what the legislation does"


Seriously now??

This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 1:18 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram