Started By
Message

re: Brooks had possession

Posted on 11/6/22 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by gabzooks
Member since Jul 2013
308 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

He snatched the ball securely and as he began to tuck and ball up, the OOB gump slapped at it causing the bobble. The argument isn’t possession. It’s degrees of possession which is a bull shite and purely subjective way for refs to control games.

Right. Which is why the overturn is the primary objection, imo
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39763 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 12:45 pm to
Add to this the reversal of the call on the field. It requires irrefutable evidence.

Can anyone say we had that in this case?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram