Started By
Message

re: 3 terrible calls last night by the refs

Posted on 11/6/22 at 7:49 am to
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61933 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 7:49 am to
quote:

1. The non targeting call where the players blatantly launches at Daniels after he gave him self up. The only reason he didn’t hit him fully is because Daniels dodged it. Those are the plays you want to call as targeting and should not have been picked up. Absolute garbage. If the ply was reverse on Young it would have been called.


Agreed. That should have still been a penalty. The guy wasn't even close, Daniels was already into his slide when he launched himself and he launched himself low. The fact that he didn't hit him should have no bearing on that call. It's a bullshite dangerous play.

quote:

2. The out of bounds touching non fumble recover. What kinda BS is that… the lsu player had 2 hands on the ball. The out of bounds player then knocked it from his hand.


He did NOT knock it from his hand, all he had to do is touch it and he killed it. It's a terrible rule.
Posted by taf
Kansas City, KS
Member since Dec 2003
759 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 7:58 am to
quote:

He did NOT knock it from his hand,


Yes. He did knock it from his hands AFTER he had it grasped with 2 hands while on the ground.
The Bama player touching the ball did not kill the play. Play was already dead.

The nonsense about Brooks not having “complete” possession is just made up. It’s a bullshite interpretation, extrapolating from the rules about a completed pass.
Posted by Swoozie
Member since Jan 2021
1059 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 9:10 am to
quote:

He did NOT knock it from his hand, all he had to do is touch it and he killed it. It's a terrible rule.

I never saw proof that he actually touched it. If someone has proof I’d love to see it.
Posted by sardog12
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
1173 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Agreed. That should have still been a penalty. The guy wasn't even close, Daniels was already into his slide when he launched himself and he launched himself low. The fact that he didn't hit him should have no bearing on that call. It's a bullshite dangerous play.


Everyone keeps saying that he didn't hit Daniels but the fact is he just didn't hit him that hard and not in the manner that he tried to but he did hit him. At the very least, it should have been the personal foul to give a message.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram