- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there a reasonable defense of not considering the Dollars Trilogy a “true trilogy”?
Posted on 8/19/22 at 11:50 pm to Madking
Posted on 8/19/22 at 11:50 pm to Madking
quote:
Right, the man with no name is the same character in all three but they were only marketed as a trilogy after the fact by United Artist.
I don’t really find the “original intent” argument all that convincing.
As far as counter arguments to it not being a true trilogy, I’m intrigued by the comment made by the poster above that Clint Eastwood is not playing the same character in each movie.
Would like some elaboration on that point from the original commenter. I hope it’s a legit analysis of how it is a different “character”, because I have some thoughts on that, and not just just another retread of the the Joe/Manco/Blondie point.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 3:19 am to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
Clint Eastwood is not playing the same character in each movie.
Clint plays the same character in every movie.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News