- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Update: (kids involved) Livingston Strikes Again - Video Voyeurism Arrest
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:00 pm to fr33manator
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:00 pm to fr33manator
quote:
You do have the right to record video inside your home without telling anyone, but—well, there are two big buts. The first: You can’t record video in any location where a person would expect to have a high degree of privacy. Those places should be pretty obvious, as noted earlier—bedrooms and bathrooms are clear examples, as is a changing room if you have a pool. But what if a guest is sleeping on your sofa, and likely using that room to dress? The author of this Fusion article describes that very situation: A person sleeping on a friend’s sofa for a few weeks discovered that she was being recorded by a Dropcam (the precursor to the Nest Cam). The situation is murky, because although it was a living room—the most public room in a home—it served as a de facto bedroom for the time the guest was using it. What makes this case even murkier is the technology involved.
Also, I think it turns into a wiretapping issue if you record audio.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:09 pm to Shexter
quote:
But what if a guest is sleeping on your sofa, and likely using that room to dress? The author of this Fusion article describes that very situation: A person sleeping on a friend’s sofa for a few weeks discovered that she was being recorded by a Dropcam (the precursor to the Nest Cam). The situation is murky, because although it was a living room—the most public room in a home—it served as a de facto bedroom for the time the guest was using it. What makes this case even murkier is the technology involved.
Well this makes it even more confusing.
So if I put a nanny cam in the living room, and the babysitter takes her clothes off and does her BF on the couch, suddenly I’d be at fault?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News