Started By
Message

re: The judge in Alex Jones’ case

Posted on 8/5/22 at 3:14 am to
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
26178 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 3:14 am to
quote:

4 mill is chump change to Alex Jones and in reality he likely never pays a dime of it.


The punitive damage portion of the trial starts tomorrow. If the jury awards punitives that is where the real pain comes in. They get to hear testimony on Jone's net worth and Free Speech Systems' valuation.


To the OP, all judges are biased it is a fact of humanity. That being said I have watched maybe 50% of the trial and haven't seen anything I could complain about from the defense table. I thought they might have a shot at appeal on the granting of the Motion for Default Judgement but the basis was bad faith in discovery so the phone records turned over by accident tend to illustrate just how serious their bad faith was.

Unfortunately for Jones ineffective assistance of counsel is limited to criminal cases in TX (as in most states) except for involuntary commitments and some parental rights cases. See Cherqui v Westheimer St. Festival Corp and Kaposta v Green. Unless it is some elaborate strategy I can't see Reynal has made an absolute mess of this case.



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram