- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:21 am to Turf Taint
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:21 am to Turf Taint
They did Carbon dating on a wooly mammoth. His skin was dated 4000 years old, his tooth 2000 years old, and another piece of tissue was dated 9000 years. All samples were from the same wooly mammoth.
Carbon dating is crap.
Carbon dating is crap.
3
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:28 am to CoyoteSong
quote:
Carbon dating is crap.
Say it a third time and it may come true.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:30 am to CoyoteSong
Living Mollusks shells dated to be 2,300 years old according to Carbon dating.
Freshly killed seal was dated to be 1,300 years old by Carbon dating.
Great science there.
Freshly killed seal was dated to be 1,300 years old by Carbon dating.
Great science there.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 7:33 am
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:47 am to CoyoteSong
quote:Link?
They did Carbon dating on a wooly mammoth. His skin was dated 4000 years old, his tooth 2000 years old, and another piece of tissue was dated 9000 years. All samples were from the same wooly mammoth.
Carbon dating is crap.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News