- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge rules against St. George incorporation
Posted on 6/1/22 at 11:20 am to CrimeStoppers
Posted on 6/1/22 at 11:20 am to CrimeStoppers
quote:
I read the judge's ruling. It seems as if though the biggest issue that is preventing the incorporation from happening is the $3 million deficit that the City of St. George would be running on day one due to the estimated cost of pension and other post-employment benefits that are paid to City-Parish Employees. Also, it appears that the incorporators did not meet with the EBR Sheriff to determine what monetary contribution the City of St. George would make to have the EBR Sheriff provide additional public safety services.
As a whole, it looks like that is the only real hold up with Judge Coady not ruling in favor of St. George, but legally it seems that the city was formed within the law, and is not racist.
It looks like there was an attempted bait and switch by incorporators trying to get people to vote for incorporation, promising no tax increases, but knowing that people who lived within the boundaries of the City of St. George would have their sales and/or property taxes increase to cover these budget shortfalls and money that would have to be raised via tax revenue to pay the EBR Sheriff for additional public safety services.
Pages 8-10 explain the judge's ruling more than anything else. The judge is pretty much saying that if you want the city, you're going to have to find a way to pay for it.
I would say it is difficult to estimate the UAL contribution considering the city refused to meet with organizers of St. George, and I don't exactly understand why there should be legacy costs at all considering St. George will still be paying their 3% into the parish coffers, which should cover parish employees. EBR is clearly going to be harmed by St. George, due to their own financial mismanagement, and the organizers should also go to the state legislature with this ruling to start the process to get a school district, which still is the end goal. It seems it is a question of financial numbers, but one thing is blatantly obvious, Baton Rouge can't balance their books without St. George, and St. George may or may not be able to, but it will be close.
This post was edited on 6/1/22 at 11:22 am
Posted on 6/1/22 at 11:49 am to TigerAlumni2010
quote:
I don't exactly understand why there should be legacy costs at all considering St. George will still be paying their 3% into the parish coffers, which should cover parish employees.
The judgment states that St. George would be paying 2% to parish coffers for the legacy costs, or $48 million. Legacy costs are $51 million, which would leave St. George with a $3 million shortfall. You don't make up that $3 million without some tax increase.
Posted on 6/1/22 at 11:56 am to TigerAlumni2010
quote:
It seems it is a question of financial numbers, but one thing is blatantly obvious, Baton Rouge can't balance their books without St. George, and St. George may or may not be able to, but it will be close.
Neither Baton Rouge or St. George would be able to balance their books without tax increases. Those increases would be much larger with Baton Rouge than St. George, but that's what happens when you function under the umbrella of a city-parish government.
If the incorporators would have negotiated with the city and proposed some revenue sharing agreement, whereby the city budget wouldn't have been cut by 45% with incorporation (but with a more modest cut of, maybe 20%), the incorporators may not be dealing with litigation.
This post was edited on 6/1/22 at 12:00 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)