- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The left keep pushing back with rape and mother's life arguments
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:13 am to imjustafatkid
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:13 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
I'm against it in every situation.
i am against it in every situation as well. the life of baby the product of rape is no less valuable.
but in the interest of fairness and compromise, i'd be willing to allow it in the instance of rape and incest or to save the life of the mother. hell, just to throw a bone, i'll say it's fine in the first trimester.
now, take that proposal to the left and see what they are willing to compromise on.
rape, incest, the life of the mother, and first trimester abortions were the norm for the majority of roe's lifespan, but the left just had to keep pushing it. it was never settled by any means, but it was left alone for the most part. when the left kept trying to get rid of the hyde amendment, we found out Planned Parenthood was definitely doing shady shite, Gossnel was a mass murderer, and blue states started to try and push 3rd trimester abortions it escalated.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 9:15 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:16 am to 3nOut
quote:
when the left kept trying to get rid of the hyde amendment, we found out Planned Parenthood was definitely doing shady shite, Gossnel was a mass murderer, and blue states started to try and push 3rd trimester abortions it escalated.
It's true. If they would have simply followed the science behind when a baby is viable, and allowed laws that would not let you kill the baby after it is viable, then this wouldn't still be an issue.
But they couldn't do that, because babies are becoming "viable" earlier and earlier as actual useful science gets better and better.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 9:17 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:19 am to 3nOut
quote:
but in the interest of fairness and compromise, I'd be willing to allow it in the instance of rape and incest or to save the life of the mother. hell, just to throw a bone, I'll say it's fine in the first trimester.
Thank you! it's funny because I went to bed with this question in my head last night--"why is the right so absolute with this abortion thing?" and woke up to find an entire thread on this topic-- but glad to see there are reasonable ppl on your side of the aisle.
I truly hope both sides comprise and agree on these exact abortion parameters as I believe it covers and satisfies most of the issues.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News