Started By
Message

re: The left keep pushing back with rape and mother's life arguments

Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:13 am to
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29560 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:13 am to
quote:

I'm against it in every situation.



i am against it in every situation as well. the life of baby the product of rape is no less valuable.

but in the interest of fairness and compromise, i'd be willing to allow it in the instance of rape and incest or to save the life of the mother. hell, just to throw a bone, i'll say it's fine in the first trimester.

now, take that proposal to the left and see what they are willing to compromise on.


rape, incest, the life of the mother, and first trimester abortions were the norm for the majority of roe's lifespan, but the left just had to keep pushing it. it was never settled by any means, but it was left alone for the most part. when the left kept trying to get rid of the hyde amendment, we found out Planned Parenthood was definitely doing shady shite, Gossnel was a mass murderer, and blue states started to try and push 3rd trimester abortions it escalated.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 9:15 am
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
53187 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:16 am to
quote:

when the left kept trying to get rid of the hyde amendment, we found out Planned Parenthood was definitely doing shady shite, Gossnel was a mass murderer, and blue states started to try and push 3rd trimester abortions it escalated.


It's true. If they would have simply followed the science behind when a baby is viable, and allowed laws that would not let you kill the baby after it is viable, then this wouldn't still be an issue.

But they couldn't do that, because babies are becoming "viable" earlier and earlier as actual useful science gets better and better.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 9:17 am
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
3693 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:19 am to
quote:

but in the interest of fairness and compromise, I'd be willing to allow it in the instance of rape and incest or to save the life of the mother. hell, just to throw a bone, I'll say it's fine in the first trimester.


Thank you! it's funny because I went to bed with this question in my head last night--"why is the right so absolute with this abortion thing?" and woke up to find an entire thread on this topic-- but glad to see there are reasonable ppl on your side of the aisle.

I truly hope both sides comprise and agree on these exact abortion parameters as I believe it covers and satisfies most of the issues.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram