- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:52 am to FredBear
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:52 am to FredBear
I think you’re going to need more than that for a successful recusal.
Every federal judge in the country was appointed by someone. That doesn’t mean there is an entire class of defendant they automatically can’t hear cases about.
Every federal judge in the country was appointed by someone. That doesn’t mean there is an entire class of defendant they automatically can’t hear cases about.
2
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:56 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Every federal judge in the country was appointed by someone. That doesn’t mean there is an entire class of defendant they automatically can’t hear cases about.
True, but it's very seldom if ever those judges sit on trails involving the spouse of the person who appointed them. I think it's completely reasonable for Trump’s team to ask for a more impartial judge
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:59 am to boosiebadazz
Trump wins on the request to have the judge recused, maybe a win legally, maybe not. All depends on the merits of the case.
Trump loses on the request to have the judge recused, he wins politically. The case still rides on its merits.
Trump loses on the request to have the judge recused, he wins politically. The case still rides on its merits.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News