- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/16/22 at 9:54 am to 777Tiger
The key issue is they consented to the collection of their dna. The type of crime is irrelevant in the inquiry as to whether police can or should be able to use it imo. If the decision is yes they can use the dna, it’s fair game for any crime.
They’re already doing it with 23andme like someone said previously
I don’t know the answer to the question but it seems like one could make an emotional argument that these women are submitting it because they were raped and still have an expectation of privacy because it’s a sensitive matter etc
They’re already doing it with 23andme like someone said previously
I don’t know the answer to the question but it seems like one could make an emotional argument that these women are submitting it because they were raped and still have an expectation of privacy because it’s a sensitive matter etc
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)