Wolensky's (CDC) transmission admission destroys all remaining COVID vaccination debate

I'm trying to understand how the OSHA debate taking place in the SCOTUS in a few hours isn't completely shut down by Wolensky's admission from Monday when she said that Covid-19 vaccines are no longer effective at preventing transmission of the virus.

If the vaccine can not prevent transmission then all forced vaccination, in any form, is off the table. And if the transmission part of it is off the table entirely then the ONLY case for vaccination at this point would be to supposedly reduce your symptoms should you contract it. Right?

So if those of us that are unvaccinated (and always will be) don't give a shite about the potential symptoms, and through our own free will choose to deal with the potential ramifications of said symptoms were we to contract it, then how can the vaccinated care any longer about whether or not we get jabbed? They're already protected.

Transmission was the only thing keeping this argument going. That somehow the vaccinated are at risk in the workplace due to this bullshite lie that it's "a pandemic of the unvaccinated", and that we may transmit it because we aren't vaccinated, is completely dead now.

If you've had the jabs then you should be perfectly fine knowing that your symptoms will supposedly be less and you should stop trying to control other people that are willing to put up with the full blown symptoms.

What am I missing here? Why isn't this all over the media? Those that have the shots have it. Let's move on with our lives.