re: Three more studies show negative vaccine efficacy.

quote:

---

Because the data is not saying what that blogger is claiming. As I learned long ago, always go to the source and don't listen to people's "interpretation." So I read the study. Lo and behold, the paper itself addresses the "negative" vaccine efficacy:

---

quote:

---

The authors conclude the negative efficacy is an artifact and an "underestimation of vaccine efficacy" (their words).

---

The data does, in fact, indicate negative efficacy, but the Authors are unwilling to accept that at face value and conclude there MUST something they weren't accounting for in the analysis.
While that may be true, it is called 'ignoring the result' and is a classic sin of science.
A real scientist would at least acknowledge that this may indicate an unknown mechanism where the vaccine has caused harm... but no one wants to actually say that because it would put a huge target on your back.