- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What about a new SEC 16 with four divisions.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 2:09 pm to molsusports
Posted on 9/21/11 at 2:09 pm to molsusports
that only allows for 8 conference games in a 16 team conference. what would be the point of a being affiliated in a conference if you only played a little more than half the teams?
Posted on 9/21/11 at 2:16 pm to 9th life
quote:
that only allows for 8 conference games in a 16 team conference. what would be the point of a being affiliated in a conference if you only played a little more than half the teams?
the scheduling is why I don't want expansion
if they do four divisions and somehow convince the NCAA to sign off on a two round conference playoff then that will make for 10 conference games against SEC opponents - years ago SEC teams might only play 5 or 6 games in conference
The SEC just shouldn't expand if they think expansion means you have to play everyone on a regular basis - the best you can do is play your regional/historical rivals every year and the more distant teams at least a couple times every 6 years. And after all - playing the more distant teams a couple times every 6 years is pretty much what LSU already does against teams like Tenn, UGA, USC, and Kentucky
Posted on 9/21/11 at 2:30 pm to daboman of Aggieland
quote:
Pod 4 (Preserves the Iron Bowl and Cocktail Party)
Georgia
Florida
Auburn
Bama
Dear God. You trying to get someone killed
Posted on 9/21/11 at 2:49 pm to Hubbhogg
Yeah, Dice converted me to his idea of:
quote:
1 - OU, OSU, MO, Arky
2 - LSU, Ole Miss, MSU, A&M
3 - AL, AU, TN, Vandy
4 - FL, GA, SC, KT
Posted on 9/21/11 at 3:00 pm to molsusports
quote:
the scheduling is why I don't want expansion
the scheduling is why i don't see 16 team conferences happening. the amount of games that teams would have to play would have to increase significantly to justify the number of mouths to feed in the conference. especially if those additional mouths to feed are large programs with bloated athletic departments to fund.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 3:04 pm to 9th life
There should not be divisions. Shouldn't have situations like mlb east last year where a team with a better record misses out on playoffs (seccg) I want to see lsu and bama play when one teams only loss is to the other. I want to see an iron bowl or cocktail party seccg. Why should a 3 loss team (usc) get to play over a 1 loss team.
16 teams. No divisions.
16 teams. No divisions.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 3:05 pm to 9th life
quote:
the amount of games that teams would have to play would have to increase significantly to justify the number of mouths to feed in the conference
revenue would have to increase significantly - but keep in mind that you would have more games even without increasing the number each team plays
Instead of 48 conference games per year (with 12 teams) you would have 64 (with 16 teams)
Now, the trick to making that more valuable to the networks is probably creative scheduling - if you can stagger the premiere in conference matchups (and avoid as many weeks with mismatches/unappealing games) then you have more of a good product to put on television.
Popular
Back to top

1




