Started By
Message
locked post

Rivalries w/ Mizzou expansion

Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:29 am
Posted by BASCTiger
34247 posts
Member since Jul 2010
5146 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:29 am
Move Mizzou & Vandy to the west
AU & Bama to east


Rivalries preserved:
Bama/AU
Bama/TN
GA/FL
GA/AU
OM/MSU
OM/LSU - although faded... I love this game

Rivalries to start:
Mizzou/Arky
LSU/aTm



Everyone happy?
Posted by mre
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2009
3090 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:31 am to
I'm sure LSU would be ecstatic.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136972 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Everyone happy?


AU, Bama, UT, UF, UGA, and UT in same division aint happening
Posted by BASCTiger
34247 posts
Member since Jul 2010
5146 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:33 am to
quote:

I'm sure LSU would be ecstatic.


Actually, why wouldn't we?
Posted by mre
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2009
3090 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:36 am to
You would be ecstatic. You'd have a division consisting of A&M, Mizzou, MSU, Mississippi, Vandy, and Arkansas. While the other division would have Alabama, Florida, Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee.

You would be penciled in as the representative of the west every single year. Schools that would definitely be against this: Alabama, Florida, Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee.
Posted by attheua
Tuscaloosa
Member since Apr 2008
5442 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:37 am to
I'd be fine with it. AU/TN/GA/UF all in the same year? UA could charge double for season tickets and still sell out
Posted by McKeezy
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Aug 2010
3940 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:57 am to
quote:

AU, Bama, UT, UF, UGA, and UT in same division aint happening


Nobody wants to see UT vs. UT every year
Posted by GWfool
Member since Aug 2010
2359 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 11:58 am to
That would suck not to play Bama, AU, or UF.
Posted by BASCTiger
34247 posts
Member since Jul 2010
5146 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Schools that would definitely be against this: Alabama, Florida, Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee.


we are playing every one of these schools this year. I don't have a problem with it.
Posted by mre
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2009
3090 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 12:11 pm to
No you're not... at least not in the regular season.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 1:09 pm to
quote:


I'd be fine with it. AU/TN/GA/UF all in the same year?


you're the only bammer on this board with any balls.
Posted by will0637
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2006
410 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 4:46 pm to
It will never happen. 5 of the top 6 winningest teams in SEC history in one division. The Big 6 need to be split 3-3 or at least 4-2. (LSU, ALA, Aub, Ten, UGA, FLA).

In order to keep conference games at 8; and keep the ALA and Aub rivalries with Ten and UGA, they have to put Mizzou in the East. If they could get OU and OSU to move into the West division, then Ala and Aub in the East would be more balanced.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram