- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Over/Under on time for SWC version 2.0 to crumble?
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:33 am
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:33 am
I am setting the mark at 5 years....
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:35 am to 225rumpshaker
ugh I think this all happens when the big 10 makes another move for ND I'm gonna go over
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:38 am to Independent Thinker
under. 3 years. pac x and bix x set up championship games. all conferences making more money and the big XII champ left out of the n.c. game. Big XII crumbles.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:39 am to dos crystal
PAC-# doesn't want a champ game.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:40 am to Independent Thinker
they don't want one but its dumb not to have one now for them. What they wanted was 16 teams and two automatic bcs bids so they wouldn't have to have a championship game. Right now they just added a useless team to take money from the other teams. I suspect them to add utah and make a championship game
This post was edited on 6/15/10 at 9:42 am
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:44 am to ELVIS U
It won't. They got more money with less risk.
A&M got more money and the lower tier teams are just happy to still be alive and kicking in the BCS.
It will only fall out if the network contract makes no money for the network. The loss of a championship game certainly should impact the bottom line.
Maybe once the next contract renewal comes up, there could be problems but not until then.
A&M got more money and the lower tier teams are just happy to still be alive and kicking in the BCS.
It will only fall out if the network contract makes no money for the network. The loss of a championship game certainly should impact the bottom line.
Maybe once the next contract renewal comes up, there could be problems but not until then.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:44 am to Independent Thinker
quote:
PAC-# doesn't want a champ game.
then why are they expanding to 12?
i think that was a selling point to the big Xll schools to get another b.c.s. game so they would come. now they aren't. pac 10 sets the game up.
they can say what they want, they don't like the s.e.c. champ garanteed a spot in the game. they are on the outside looking in. they thought the addition of ou, ut, with usc would give them the credibility they needed.
Popular
Back to top
3







